Reverse Osmosis Filter

Why is not the best by a reverse osmosis filter in terms of conservation?

If you are a conservative, your primary goal to save or preserve the natural resources of our planet. Fresh water is one of our most important natural resources. No one could survive long without him.

The researchers believe that the shortage of drinking water in many countries in the coming decades due to population growth, industry, global warmingand simple waste.

Why a water filter?

One of the reasons to use filters at home, rather than buying bottled in bottles to reduce waste. Wastewater is generated when the bottles are produced and other production processes. According to scientific estimates for each bottle, which is suitable for drinking, I wasted three bottlefuls.
RO Reverse Osmosis or, worse, in terms of waste water. A budget that is 5 liters per deliveryDay could make 40-90 gallons of wastewater. This creates a burden on the homepage of the septic system, as well as environmental problems.

Why is not the best reverse osmosis filter for chemical reduction?
The porous membrane of RO systems differ in size, but the smallest membrane allows to pass chemical contaminants. There is no way to stop them.

The only effective means of chemical reduction is the carbon in the form of water Granules or a block of carbon. The chemicals are captured by a process called adsorption.

Some of the most recent domestic RO systems include a phase of carbon for chemical reduction. But the question is this. Why RO is a step necessary? In private homes it is not.

For large treatment plants and other industrial applications, the pressure can be increased to reduce waste. Although some manufacturers use only a water bottle RO step, most use a carbon atom> Filter to enhance the security of taste, which is also consistent.

You can not increase the pressure in a large enough budget to increase the efficiency of an RO system. In addition, it is not practical to ask for a home, the RO membranes on a daily basis to check the wear.

Thus, while RO can be suitable for industrial applications, it is not the best choice for private homeowners. Here is another question.

Why is not the best reverse osmosisFilters for the reduction of lead and cyst reduction?

If you have a problem with lead or doubts about the cyst, the RO may propose a system to have for your home. RO can only reduce the lead content of the federal action level, so some of the heavy metals may still be present and no amount of exposure to lead is a safe way.

A step called ion exchange more than 99.9% of all traces of lead from a sample was removed. For 99.9% reduction of cysts, a sub-micronstage particle filtration is necessary. Fortunately, there are some good family systems, all using these steps, waste water, no electricity, last longer and cost less than RO.

Why is not the best reverse osmosis filter for your home? Well, you know the answer.

And now you can visit the website at pure clean water for updated information about the contaminated water from the tap water included.